Comments on: Budweiser – Select 55 – Super Bowl 2010

By: Dave

Dave — Mon, 26 Apr 2010 23:05:43 +0000

Everyone was disappointed and now I don’t get to see it for myself. This sucks.

By: Nick

Nick — Sun, 25 Apr 2010 22:01:14 +0000

I was very disappointed that Budweiser did not have a Clysdale commercial this year, so many people look forward to them, why the missing ad?

By: Alan

Alan — Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:22:10 +0000

Everyone was disappointed and now I don’t get to see it for myself. This sucks.

By: Martin

Martin — Sat, 24 Apr 2010 20:48:49 +0000

I was very disappointed that Budweiser did not have a Clysdale commercial this year, so many people look forward to them, why the missing ad?

By: Spazz

Spazz — Sat, 13 Feb 2010 10:43:06 +0000

Guess since Budweiser is no longer an American company we don’t get good commercials anymore.

By: Disappointed

Disappointed — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:44:41 +0000

Inbev’s leader is very cheap and it shows through this year’s super bowl commerical. When they bought Interbrew/Labatt’s they stripped out all non-essentials. I suspect the same has happened to AB.

By: admin

admin — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 12:25:58 +0000

Looks like InBev has got this commercial yanked from online sources. Guess they don’t need people talking about how bad this commercial is.

Post a link here if you find a copy online.

By: Ken

Ken — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:22:53 +0000

Everyone was disappointed and now I don’t get to see it for myself. This sucks.

By: Scrumpty

Scrumpty — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:03:29 +0000

Ok..so now they don’t work…site update please.

By: PAM-PAM

PAM-PAM — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:10:55 +0000

Foreigner – you are right on… InBev just doesn’t get it…….